« Obama on Constitutional Law: Did He Lie or Is He Just Ignorant? | Main | The Highest Mastery »

Friday, April 06, 2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Thanks, Bill.

I agree wholeheartedly with the Principle of Subsidiarity and Kuyper's political philosophy would be very close to my own.

My reservation about countering "social justice" with "subsidiarity" (other than the unloveliness of the term itself) is that it doesn't capture all that conservatives want to say about political and economic justice. It represents one principle of justice (natural justice, I would say!) rather than justice as such. It's a part rather than the whole.

Does the Principle of Subsidiarity, for example, speak to the proper relationship between justice and inequality? For example, whether it is just for John's wealth to be several hundred times that of Phil's is less a matter of the disparity itself than it is a matter of the means by which they obtained (or failed to obtain) their wealth. It is on points such as this that the notion of "social justice" needs to be countered head-on.

The quest continues!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Google Search Engine

My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 10/2008

Categories

Categories

November 2017

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    
Blog powered by Typepad