0) What David Armstrong calls truthmaker maximalism is the thesis that every truth has a truthmaker. Although I find the basic truthmaker intuition well-nigh irresistible, I have difficulty with the notion that every truth has a trut...
Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, 2nd ed., p. 299, Rand speaking:
What do you mean by "necessity"? By "necessity," we mean that things are a certain way and had to be. I would maintain that the statement "Things are," when refe...
Continue reading "Ayn Rand on Necessity, Contingency, and Dispositions" »
Preliminary note: what has been exercising me lately is the question whether there is a deep common root to the political identitarianism of the Left and the Right, and if there is, what this root is. Nihilism, perhaps?
I wrote:
. ...
(Theme music: Ballad of a Thin Man)
Phoenicians and Londoners agree that 'Some F is a G' and 'An FG exists' are logically equivalent. Thus, 'Some man is white' is logically equivalent to 'A white man exists.' But I take a further step...
Over the phone the other night, Steven Nemes told me that his project is to synthesize Thomism and phenomenology. I expressed some skepticism. Here are my reasons.
Part I: Methodological Incompatibility
Essential to Thomism is the beli...
Comment by BV on “God: A Being among Beings or Being Itself?”
Posted by: BV | Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 02:48 PM