Why are liberals so condescending? Especially when they are so frightfully wrong about so frightfully much? Gerard Alexander's WaPo article is an outstanding piece of analysis. Liberal disdain is expressed "in the form of four major narratives about who conservatives are and how they think and function."
1. "The first is the 'vast right-wing conspiracy,' a narrative made famous by Hillary Rodham Clinton but hardly limited to her. This vision maintains that conservatives win elections and policy debates not because they triumph in the open battle of ideas but because they deploy brilliant and sinister campaign tactics."
2. "But, if conservative leaders are crass manipulators, then the rank-and-file Americans who support them must be manipulated at best, or stupid at worst. This is the second variety of liberal condescension, exemplified in Thomas Frank's best-selling 2004 book, 'What's the Matter With Kansas?' Frank argued that working-class voters were so distracted by issues such as abortion that they were induced into voting against their own economic interests."
3. "The third version of liberal condescension points to something more sinister. In his 2008 book, 'Nixonland,' progressive writer Rick Perlstein argued that Richard Nixon created an enduring Republican strategy of mobilizing the ethnic and other resentments of some Americans against others. Similarly, in their 1992 book, 'Chain Reaction,' Thomas Byrne Edsall and Mary D. Edsall argued that Nixon and Reagan talked up crime control, low taxes and welfare reform to cloak racial animus and help make it mainstream. It is now an article of faith among many liberals that Republicans win elections because they tap into white prejudice against blacks and immigrants."
4. "Finally, liberals condescend to the rest of us when they say conservatives are driven purely by emotion and anxiety -- including fear of change -- whereas liberals have the harder task of appealing to evidence and logic. Former vice president Al Gore made this case in his 2007 book, 'The Assault on Reason,' in which he expressed fear that American politics was under siege from a coalition of religious fundamentalists, foreign policy extremists and industry groups opposed to "any reasoning process that threatens their economic goals.'"
Recent Comments