I started using it yesterday. It's faster but the display is not as pretty. Must speed be purchased in the coin of a substandard display?
« Christopher Hitchens on the Topic of Cancer | Main | Dennis Miller Has Some Advice for Imam Rauf and Co. »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
It's what I use. I like the stripped down simplicity and the blazing speed, not to mention the added security. Though after using Explorer of Firefox, it does take some getting used to.
Posted by: Brennon | Wednesday, August 18, 2010 at 07:46 PM
I actually think it renders much, much prettier than Firefox or IE...
Posted by: Matteo | Wednesday, August 18, 2010 at 07:47 PM
The display has a cheesy, thin, less solid look. Remember the old dot matrix printers without 'true descenders'?
Posted by: Bill Vallicella | Thursday, August 19, 2010 at 10:37 AM
If you want a pretty display, check out Safari.
Posted by: Clark | Thursday, August 19, 2010 at 10:37 AM
Chrome owned by Google however. And they aren't the most privacy-friendly organization.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome#Usage_tracking
Posted by: Matt Hart | Friday, August 20, 2010 at 08:50 AM
Thanks Matt. I deleted Google Chrome. It kept triggering my Webroot security.
Posted by: Bill Vallicella | Saturday, August 21, 2010 at 12:37 PM
And thanks to the rest of you for your comments.
Posted by: Bill Vallicella | Saturday, August 21, 2010 at 12:38 PM