« Oxymoron of the Day: 'President Obama' | Main | Tête-à-tête »

Tuesday, June 04, 2013


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


You say

In short, absolutely everything can be thought of, without logical contradiction, as not existing,
But doesn't the bolded sentence contradict what I said in earlier posts about the impossibility of there being nothing at all, that there must be something or other, and that this can be known a priori by pure thought?
Your worry appears to be that
1. Everything is contingent,
2. Necessarily, there exists something,
are inconsistent. But is that so? A library of N books might operate with a maximum of N-1 books out on loan at any one time. At any time, any given book may possibly be on loan, yet necessarily at least one book remains on the shelves.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 10/2008



June 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Blog powered by Typepad