« Judging People | Main | Cognitive Dissonance or Doxastic Dissonance? »

Sunday, June 22, 2014


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


If the distinction exists in any way outside of the mind, either as real or metaphysical, it cannot be what the Thomists call 'virtual', for they define the virtual distinction as being purely logical. Therefore, what they call 'virtual distinction' cannot be other than no distinction whatsoever. So it's useless to try to figure out what kind of distinction the virtual distinction is because it's, by definition, not a distinction at all, except a logical one.

So what's the point of virtual distinction? It's merely a way to signify the absolute simplicity of a cause whose effects, however, are diverse and distinct from one another.

I am basing my discussion on Feser, and he would say you are mistaken: a virtual distinction is not purely logical. See his Schol. Metaph. pp. 72-73.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 10/2008



May 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by Typepad