David Harsanyi's refutation of Bret Stephens' call to repeal the Second Amendment begins like this:
The idea that gun-control advocates don’t want to confiscate your weapons is, of course, laughable. They can’t confiscate your weapons, so they support whatever feasible incremental steps inch further towards that goal. Some folks are more considerate and get right to the point.
Exactly right. Never underestimate the mendacity of a leftist.
You will have noticed that the Left is now opposing free speech. Time then to repeat: It is the Second Amendment that provides the concrete back-up to the First.
A few days before the Las Vegas massacre I penned an entry that refutes Stephens' optimism about disagreement. He naively thinks that mutually respectful conversations on hot-button issues will converge on agreement. Well, events have borne me out.
Can anyone in his right mind think that 'conversations' about the Second Amendment will converge on agreement?
You see, when a leftist speaks of 'conversations,' what he means is that the right-minded need to shut up and acquiesce in what the loons say.
To which the only rational and appropriate response is of the middle-fingered sort.
Recent Comments