I'm pretty good with the invective, but I can't hold a candle to Kurt Schlichter. Here is another taste:
Yes, the Democrats do have a major advantage in the fact that the Republican establishment, especially in Congress, is largely a gaggle of drooling idiots. From Sissy Sasse to Foamy Marco, these fussy failures seem determined to demoralize the base with their tedious moralizing about how “We are better than that” and “Oh, well I never.” The GOP would have no problem if these dorks had just one tenth the will to win as they do the will to posture for the benefit of a liberal media that hates them and that will disembowel them the moment they stop being useful idiots and become merely idiots.
To say that invective has no place in political discourse would be like saying that shooting has no place in warfare.
Take Hillary. She is a greedy, crooked, slanderous, race-baiting liar. You cannot engage a miserable specimen like this on the plane of reason. You have to punch back with mockery, derision, and invective. And throw in a little contumely for good measure.
You don't think she is a slanderous, race-baiting, liar? See here:
Hillary Clinton on Thursday slammed the Trump administration for promoting "racist and white supremacist" views while praising her "dear friend" Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) for being one of the leading opposition voices.
White supremacist? Maxine Waters? Birds of a feather flock together.
You need to tell us what a white supremacist is, Hillary, and define 'racist' while you are at it. Put up or STFU.
Related:
Recent Comments