Let's begin with a very simple distinction between the behavior one would rightly demand of a judge who was adjudicating a dispute between two parties, and the behavior of a citizen defending himself against very serious but groundless accusations. From a judge one expects and demands impartiality. The demand is reasonable and can be met because judges are not themselves parties to the disputes they mediate. A judge with an interest in the outcome must recuse himself.
But it is unreasonable in the extreme to expect a citizen who is defending himself from a scurrilous, potentially career-ending attack to display a calm judicial temperament as if he were above the fray and not precisely being attacked.
In fact, if Judge Kavanaugh had not defended himself with passion and righteous indignation, his enemies would have taken it as proof of his guilt. "You see, he is guilty! Any normal person would have vigorously contested the accusations brought against him!"
You can see from this just how vicious Senator Feinstein and her colleagues are. The simple distinction explained above is obvious and of course they understand it They would deploy it themselves if it were to their advantage. They are not stupid; they are willing to play dirty if it assures them of victory. They are obviously out to stop the Kavanaugh confirmation by any means. Schumer has in fact said precisely that.
The hypocrisy is to preach the importance of impartiality while failing to practice it oneself. Feinstein and her gang are supposed to be impartially evaluating the nominee, not accusing him of impartiality in a matter in which it would be inappropriate for him to be impartial!
But it may be worse than hypocrisy. To preach impartiality is to have at least some commitment to it. But there is increasingly little reason to think that the Dems are committed to the values we cherish. It certainly looks as if they want one thing only, power, any way thy can get it. And impartiality be damned. If impartiality is to their power advantage, then they are impartial, if not, not.
They have one goal: power and total control. The Constitution, interpreted as written, stands in their way. That is why they will do anything to destroy the textualist/originalist Kavanaugh.
So it's a war. It's a war because there s no common ground. One cannot compromise with people who will do anything to win and who reject such bedrock principles as the presumption of innocence.
Recent Comments