« Word of the Day: Psephology | Main | Democratic Socialism »

Monday, September 09, 2019


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"Surely it is a substantive question whether concrete, mind-independent reality is static or dynamic."

I find this very doubtful. The same sorts of argument can be used here: that any differences are merely linguistic in character. I started to right out the details, but it became too long, so I posted a blog entry: https://brainlegions.wordpress.com/2019/09/11/it-is-a-substantive-question-whether-time-is-static-or-dynamic/

I just thought of a brief way to express my reasons for doubting that there is a substantial matter of fact about whether the A-theory or the B-theory of time is correct. The problem is that there is a logical, necessary relationship between the two theories such that if one theory is true then the other theory is true. They are just two different ways of visualizing or thinking about the same basic facts.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 10/2008



September 2019

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Blog powered by Typepad