« Praeparatio Mortis | Main | Saturday Night at the Oldies: Marie/Maria/Mary »

Saturday, April 18, 2020


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

“What the presentist is maintaining is that only what exists (present tense) exists tenselessly.”

One possible meaning for ‘X exists tenselessly” means “X is or was (or will be?) something”. If so, why would anyone hold that everything that exists tenselessly, exists in the present?

Presumably the anti-presentist denies that meaning, but the correct meaning needs to be made clear.

FYI my friend Magali Roques recently wrote on the medieval theory of natural supposition, “the mode of reference that a term has when the proposition in which it occurs as a subject term causes it to be taken for all its significates regardless of the tense of the proposition”.


What are propositions on presentism? Do they exist in time? If not, it's not even true on presentism that “BV is alive”. If so, propositions might have to be contingent, and it might be possible that “BV was alive” is neither true nor false (e.g. if propositions are mental and nobody is thinking it).

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 10/2008



May 2023

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Blog powered by Typepad