« A Note on Feminism and My Conservatism | Main | "History is written by the victors." »

Monday, May 11, 2020

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

So there is the state of being wholly past, which is the verbal noun from the infinitive 'to be wholly past' which is from the verb phrase 'is wholly past'.

Again, what is the substantive philosophical issue here?

Ostrich,

So there is the state of being wholly past, which is the verbal noun from the infinitive 'to be wholly past' which is from the verb phrase 'is wholly past'.

Category mistake?

Bill,

Presentism, as a thesis about the very Being of all beings, restricts everything to the present time, including the temporal modes, past and future.
This is surely an inference too far. Presentism is a thesis about substantial change not accidental change. In a world with accidental change but no substantial change presentism would be vacuously true but time would remain.

Perhaps an alternative conclusion from the argument is that presentism implies that temporal determinations are not properties.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 10/2008

Categories

Categories

November 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Blog powered by Typepad