That's true. No person is illegal. But who ever said that any person was?
'Woke' knuckleheads of the sort who recently criticized Joey B's SOTU reference to Lincoln Laken Riley's murderer as 'an illegal' regularly give something like the following lame argument:
1) No person is illegal.
2) If any person is justifiably labelled an 'illegal alien,' then some persons are illegal.
Therefore
3) No person is justifiably labelled an 'illegal alien.'
Therefore
4) The expression 'illegal alien' and such related expressions as 'illegal immigrant' must be banned.
There is no need to concern ourselves with the inferential move from (3) to (4). The argument is unsound because (2) is plainly false.
To see that it is false you have to be able to distinguish between agent and action, between doer and deed. 'Illegals' are so-called because of their illegal action, namely their illegal entry into the country, and not because they themselves, as agents, are illegal.
Of course, an appeal to sweet reason will get you nowhere with a leftist; what they understand is the hard fist of unreason.
As I have said many times, it is unreasonable to expect that all disputes can be settled reasonably.
And yet we have to have reasons at the ready for the reasonable.
That is why I wrote the above. Besides, I'm a natural-born scribbler who just loves to write, and loves to read what he has written. The life of the mind is its own reward.
Comments