Why did Kamala lose? Here:
One answer has to do with race and gender. Too many Americans, especially white men, were still not willing to vote for a woman, even less a Black woman.
Only a leftist scumbag could spew such slanderous garbage. The vast majority of conservatives don't care about a candidate's race or sex. We care about ideas and policies. If the contest were between Joe Biden and Tulsi Gabbard, most conservatives would vote for Tulsi Gabbard.
UPDATE (11/8)
Speaking of Tulsi Gabbard, on one of the talk shows last night she pointed out that Biden and Harris never once showed any concern about the very real threat of WW3 whereas Trump repeatedly demonstrated awareness of the grave danger we and the world are in under the 'leadership' of Biden and Harris. I would add that one of the many reasons why the Clown got crushed was because of her insouciance regarding this genuine existential threat to humanity as opposed to the fake 'threats' cooked up by the Dementocrat tag team.
It's only Democracy if the Left wins: From Kutner's article:
"Democracy was already seriously debased even before Trump’s appalling victory. "
I could comment further, but I would be using swear words.
Who could be weak-minded enough to read such an article and agree with it?
Posted by: Joe Odegaard | Thursday, November 07, 2024 at 07:00 PM
The Democrat's are not only attacking white men, but are now slandering Latinos. Nikole Hannah-Jones, the creator of the 1619 Project believes a major reason Trump won is because Latinos are racist. The author claims "anti-Blackness is deeply embedded in Latino cultures." Morning Joe claimed Democrats "need to be honest" that "it's not just misogyny from white men, but misogyny from Hispanic men" and "a lot of Hispanic voters have problems with black candidates." The Democrats can't believe that 46% of Latino voters voted for Trump. Their only response is to call them all racist.
Posted by: Kurt Schneider | Thursday, November 07, 2024 at 11:30 PM
Race-delusionality on stilts. Will this madness ever end?
I just had an idea for a bumper sticker, one too subtle to provoke a rear-ending from a Kamalist:
1619? 1984!
Posted by: BV | Friday, November 08, 2024 at 07:50 AM
Catacomb Joe is old enough to remember this one:
AuH2O64 (the '2' needs subscripting)
But I say unto you, my friends, in my patented SIXHRB code: AuPb24
Another attempt at being punny: What comes between 45 and 47? Zero!
Posted by: BV | Friday, November 08, 2024 at 07:57 AM
Bro Bill, I also remember the competing bumper sticker from long ago, and it was:
Au H2O Pu
Even then, those were better days. The Mass was in Latin, the Priest faced God, and there was no artificially chummy handshake. If I had a time machine, I'd go back. But we can only go forward.
We only have these times we're living in:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNacOVmerhU
Posted by: Joe Odegaard | Friday, November 08, 2024 at 02:03 PM