This article by Laurence Vance is here. Link courtesy of Tony Flood who comments:
A thought: if the imposition of taxes isn't "revenue neutral" for the government why, in order to be taken seriously, must "revenue neutrality" characterize every proposal for tax reform? It reminds me of the claims former slaveowners made for "compensation" for the loss of their property, when it was rather the slaves who deserved compensation.
It goes without saying that my posting of a link does not constitute an endorsement of the linked material. It merely indicates that I think it is worthy of consideration.
Bill, the link to Tony Flood's website is not working. Robert
Posted by: Robert | Wednesday, 18 May 2005 at 17:35
Thanks, Robert. I'll fix it.
Posted by: Bill Vallicella | Wednesday, 18 May 2005 at 18:20